![]() ![]() I load up a dummy round using the comparitor gauges to get as close to my desired CBTO as possible (spin and recheck in the comparator a couple of times). 022 im not going to stress about it as long as all my loads are coming out within 1 or 2 thousandths of EACH OTHER at CBTO. I don't get hung up on being at lets say exactly. Also if you tighten the comparitor body onto your caliper arm too much it will actually cock the comparator off a little bit. ![]() If you take a measurement and then spin the cartridge a little and repeat you will find that you can sometimes get several different measurements that vary by a few thousandths. In my experience I have found the Hornady comparator gauges aren't the most consistent things in the world. base of the case) to bullet contact point in the die (which should be bullet shoulder) should be a constant, and any difference in bullet length or case length just results in a difference in how much the case and bullet overlap, not in a difference in the cartridge overall length. However, I'm trying to figure out how a variation in bullet length-to-ogive would matter - if the two contact points when seating a bullet are the press ram at the base of the case and the die at the bullet tip to shoulder pressing the two together (i,e, you're holding the bottom of the case and the top of the bullet and squeezing them together), shouldn't any variation in bullet base-to-ogive just result in a variation in how far down the base of the bullet sits in the case, not in a difference in the shoulder-to-cartridge-base distance? I'm thinking that the ram (i.e. I just measured six bullets, and the length to ogive was 3 at 1.075, 2 at 1.065, and 1 at 1.060, so there is some variation there. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |